Guys, you are charging $12.50 a pop for these. Can you believe that one of them had only TWO paragraphs in the reading? Two of them had only three paragraphs, none of them had point-counterpoint matching structures. The three samples I bought from Edusynch didn’t do this. The lecture actually mirrors the reading so much that it challenges the points in the exact same order as they are presented in the reading! Of course a lecture can’t have paragraphs… but if you were to type out a typical TOEFL integrated question you would see that it starts with an introduction, and that one at a time it specifically challenges each of the points from the reading. After that, there are three body paragraphs, and each one of them presents one point in support of the main argument. The first paragraph states the main argument of the reading. That is what an integrated writing question is supposed to look like. If you are reading this, People of Edusynch, take a look at the following graphic: One of them was, ostensibly, a “supporting type” question which is a style that hasn’t appeared on the TOEFL since 2005. None of them followed the structure used by ETS. Afterwards you can compare your recording to a sample answer.Well, I took three of the writing simulations offered by Edusynch, and they were all terrible. Perhaps the variety of activities kept her motivated, or maybe she was just a particularly bright student with a good memoryĪfter 30 seconds, please speak into the microphone. However, we can’t assume it was the VAK theory that helped her remember. The fact that the student could remember the shape of the oak leaf suggests that applying the VAK theory is a useful way of helping students to learn. The part where they go outside and look at leaves is kinesthetic. The photos, and the part where the students copy pictures of leaves is visual, although you could say that copying pictures is kinesthetic too. The game, where the students name trees, and the teacher’s opening talk, is designed to suit auditory learners, because at this point, they’re only using their ears. The professor’s example shows a teacher doing just this. The theory suggests that teachers need to include a range of activities in their lessons so that all pupils, whether they are visual, auditory or kinesthetic, get the chance to learn. Visual people learn best through looking at things, auditory learners learn best when they hear something, and kinesthetic learners learn best by doing. The idea behind the VAK theory is that everyone has a preferred way of learning. A week later I asked one of them to describe to me the leaf of an oak tree, and she did so perfectly. So it was quite an effective lesson – very memorable, and the pupils looked very engaged. After that, students got the chance to go out into the school grounds and physically identify some of the trees that were there. Students then copied some of the pictures into their exercise books. But that was okay, because next she showed some photos for them to look at on the electronic whiteboard, then passed around some picture books. But you can imagine that the kids who don’t have very good imaginations… they couldn’t really visualize what she was talking about… their minds were starting to wander, they were shuffling in their seats and getting distracted. Then after that little activity, she described the different ways you can identify trees – from the shape of their leaves, their buds, their bark and so on. The first thing she did was to play a game where students had to name as many trees as they could – without writing anything down, just speaking out loud. The teacher was teaching children about nature… about plants – specifically about how to identify different trees. Although it is not yet proven that using one’s preferred sense provides the best means for learning, having a range of activities can reduce boredom and increase motivation in the classroom.Īn example of how you might go about this is, well, I’ll describe a lesson I observed a few weeks ago. Teachers are beginning to incorporate a range of stimuli and activities into their lessons so as to cater for all types of learner. VAK is one of the most popular learning models nowadays due to its simplicity. Thus a visual learner learns best using their sight an auditory learner learns best when listening, and a kinesthetic learner learns best through physical activity. According to the VAK theory, one or two of these receiving styles is normally dominant and thus defines the best way for a person to learn new information. One theory of learning states that we use three sensory receivers: visual (V), auditory (A), and kinesthetic (K) when we take in information. (Reading time in an actual test would be 45-50 seconds.) Read a passage from a teaching textbook and listen to the lecture that follows it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |